Definition: And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from John 18:2: “And Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.” Basically, it tells us that Judas, one of Jesus's betrayers, was aware of where Jesus was going. Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “And Judas also…” : This refers to the person named Judas. “…which betrayed him…” : This is the key part – Judas betrayed Jesus. He turned against him and revealed his location to his followers. “knew the place:” : This means he was aware of where Jesus was headed. It wasn’t just that he saw him; he understood where he was going. “…for Jesus ofttimes resorted thither with his disciples.” : This is a bit more complex, but it means Jesus frequently went to this particular location (likely a place where he was planning to meet with his followers). He kept returning to it. What’s the significance? This verse highlights that Judas wasn’t just passively involved in betraying Jesus; he had knowledge of his path and actively returned to a specific spot. It suggests a pattern or something significant about his actions. It adds a layer of drama and emphasizes the timing of the betrayal – it happened after Jesus had already been visiting this place. In short, it's telling us that Judas was aware of where Jesus was going and he returned to that location frequently. --- Would you like me to: Explain another verse? Provide a little context about the events leading up to this verse?

Definition: Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from John 18:20. It's a really interesting and complex passage that touches on Jesus’ ministry and his relationship with the Jewish community. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: Jesus is saying he always spoke to people, both publicly (in synagogues and temples) and privately (secretly). He’s acknowledging a pattern of speaking to them throughout his life – a consistent habit. Let's unpack it piece by piece: “John 18:20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world…” - This is Jesus answering a question or statement made by John (the author of John 18). He’s acknowledging that he did speak. “…I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort.” – This describes where he frequently spoke. He taught in synagogues (religious gatherings) and temples – places where Jewish people gathered to worship. “Whither the Jews always resort” means that he consistently spoke to them there. “And in secret have I said nothing.” - This is the crucial part. Jesus says he never spoke openly or publicly about his teachings or message. He only taught privately, behind closed doors. What does this all mean? It suggests a few things: Jesus was a quiet and thoughtful teacher: He wasn’t interested in grand public displays of teaching. He preferred to communicate through private conversations and revelations. He valued privacy and personal connection: His method of teaching was about building relationships – understanding people individually. It highlights his role as Messiah: It's often interpreted that Jesus was preparing for his ministry, quietly planting seeds of truth and wisdom within the Jewish community. Important Note: This verse is part of a larger story about Jesus’ ministry, particularly his interaction with John the Baptist. It’s a significant moment in understanding how Jesus began to reveal His identity and purpose. --- Do you want me to: Explain another portion of this verse? Provide context – like what happened before or after this passage? Discuss its significance within the Bible?

Definition: Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this incredibly important passage from John 18:21. It's a really fascinating and revealing moment in Jesus’s ministry. Here’s the explanation in simple terms: The Core of the Verse: Jesus is responding to someone who is questioning him – likely a follower or even a skeptical person. The question isn’t about what he said; it’s about who heard him and what they actually understood. Let's unpack it step-by-step: 1. “Why askest thou me?” - This is a bit of a rhetorical question, meaning Jesus is acknowledging the person’s challenge. He’s saying, “You’re asking me why I’m answering this question?” 2. “ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them” – This is the key part. He's focusing on the people who listened to him. He’s asking: "Who were the people who actually heard what I said? What did I say?" 3. “behold, they know what I said.” - This is where the surprise comes in. Jesus then reveals that they – those who listened – understood his words perfectly. What does this mean? This verse highlights a few important things: Jesus’s Authority & Truth: It shows that Jesus wasn't just talking; he was delivering powerful truths and teachings. He wasn’t simply sharing opinions; he was offering God’s word directly. The Importance of Listening: The verse emphasizes the value of listening to someone. The people were attentive and receptive, which is a good thing! Jesus's Communication: It reinforces that Jesus’s message was clear and meaningful – he wasn’t just making speeches; he was delivering divine guidance. Overall Significance: This verse isn’t about a specific event. It’s a powerful statement about the quality of Jesus's message. It suggests that his words were true, authoritative, and impactful because they resonated with those who listened to him. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of this passage? Provide context for the story (like why it’s significant in the Bible)?

Definition: And when he had thus spoken, one of the officers which stood by struck Jesus with the palm of his hand, saying, Answerest thou the high priest so?

Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from John 18:22. It’s a really important and dramatic moment in Jesus’ trial. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: What's Happening? Jesus is being questioned by the Roman authorities (the officials who were watching him). They are trying to figure out if he’s guilty of something. They’re essentially asking, “Are you admitting to things that might make you guilty?” Let’s unpack it: “And when he had thus spoken…” – This means Jesus was just finishing a statement or saying something. “…one of the officers which stood by struck Jesus with the palm of his hand.” - This is a physical action. One of the guards, likely a soldier or someone watching closely, slammed their hand down on Jesus’ arm. It's a forceful gesture. “saying, Answerest thou the high priest so?” – This is the crucial part. They’re asking him a question: “Are you admitting to what he said?” They are essentially challenging him to admit to something that was already being discussed. What's the Significance? This verse is significant because it shows: Jesus wasn’t denying anything. Despite being arrested and facing accusations, Jesus didn’t immediately respond with a denial or an excuse. He continued to speak. He was defending himself. It suggests he was trying to protect his reputation and maintain his authority. It's a challenge to the authorities. The officers were trying to intimidate him. This action demonstrates Jesus’ unwavering belief in his truth and his refusal to be silenced. In short, this verse shows Jesus standing firm despite being questioned, refusing to be intimidated, and continuing to speak truth. --- Do you want me to: Explain a different part of the passage? Connect this verse to a broader theme in the Bible (like forgiveness or truth)?

Definition: Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil: but if well, why smitest thou me?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this incredibly important passage from John 18:23. It’s a really complex verse, and it’s often misunderstood! Here's an explanation in simple terms: The Basic Situation: Jesus was arrested and put on trial for Jesus’s murder. He had just spoken to the crowd and then was betrayed by one of his disciples. The Gospels (the accounts of Jesus’ life) tell us that he was severely beaten and humiliated. What Jesus is Saying – It's a Question about His Actions: Jesus isn’t saying he did do something wrong. He's asking a profound question: “If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil.” Let’s unpack that: "Speak Evil?" - This is a really powerful phrase. It means Jesus felt like he was being dishonest or misleading. He believed he was lying about something crucial – perhaps about his words, or about his intentions. “Bear Witness of the Evil?” – This is where it gets deeper. The word “witness” means to tell a truth. So, he’s asking if he is being deceptive, if he's making something up that isn't true. What Jesus Means (and what scholars believe): Most Bible scholars interpret this verse as a statement about Jesus’s own conscience and his desire to be truthful. He was feeling deeply troubled by the situation – the betrayal, the beating, and the potential for him to be misleading. He wasn't trying to accuse anyone; he was simply grappling with his own guilt and asking if he had been dishonest in some way. Important Note: It’s NOT about a deliberate lie. It’s more about a feeling of deep remorse and a desire for honesty. Why is this verse so significant? This passage highlights several key themes: Jesus's humanity: It shows that Jesus was deeply concerned with his own actions and the truthfulness of his words, even when he was facing intense pressure. The importance of honesty: It emphasizes that honesty is crucial – it’s not enough to simply say something; you need to be truthful about what you've done. The struggle between good and evil: It shows a moment where even someone seemingly righteous could wrestle with doubt and remorse. --- Resources for further understanding: Bible Gateway: [https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/18/John](https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/18/John) - This website has summaries and explanations of biblical passages. Wikipedia – John 18:23: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_18%2A23] - A good overview of the context and interpretation. Would you like me to: Explain a different part of this verse in more detail? Discuss the historical context surrounding this passage?

Definition: Now Annas had sent him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down that verse from John 18:24. It’s a really important and dramatic moment in Jesus’ story. Here's what it means in simple terms: Basically, Jesus was being held captive by the High Priest Caiaphas. Let’s unpack that a little further: “Now Annas had sent him bound…” This means that Annas, a high priest, had already put Jesus under arrest and restraint. He wasn't just waiting for a trial; he was already legally involved in a legal situation. “…unto Caiaphas the high priest.” This identifies the person who is holding Jesus captive – the High Priest Caiaphas. He’s a respected leader of the Jewish religious community. So, what does this tell us? It's a significant sign that Jesus had been arrested and facing charges. It suggests that he was being questioned and potentially threatened by the authorities. It implies that Jesus was in danger or under pressure. Why is this important? This passage shows Jesus’ power and authority. It highlights his ability to stand against those who oppose him – even a high priest. It also sets the stage for some of the most intense events in the Gospels, like the confrontation with Caiaphas. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Give you more context about this event?

Definition: And Simon Peter stood and warmed himself. They said therefore unto him, Art not thou also [one] of his disciples? He denied [it], and said, I am not.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this short passage from John 18:25. It’s a really important moment in Jesus’ ministry – it’s about him revealing his identity to the crowd after he calmed down after his arrest. Here's what it means in simpler terms: Basically, Jesus is saying: “I know you’re one of my followers. I’ve seen you before. But I deny that I am one of you.” Let’s unpack it a bit further: “Simon Peter stood and warmed himself” : This describes him in the moment he was being questioned – he was likely feeling uncomfortable or perhaps slightly upset. “They said therefore unto him, Art not thou also [one] of his disciples?” : This is the crucial part. They’re asking him if he's one of his followers. "He denied it, and said, I am not." This is where the real meaning lies. He firmly refused to acknowledge that he was a follower. He clearly stated, "I am not." What does this tell us about Jesus? This isn't just a simple denial of being a follower; it’s a powerful statement about his identity and his purpose. It suggests: He is unique: He’s distinct from the other people who were following him. He’s claiming authority: By denying himself, he’s asserting his own importance and power as Messiah – the one who came to offer forgiveness and salvation. It's a crucial moment of revealing: This is the first time Jesus clearly stated that he was the one who was speaking to them. Why is this significant? This passage is considered one of the most important in the Gospels because it demonstrates Jesus’ divine nature and his relationship with humanity. It's a fundamental statement about who he is and what he's doing. --- Do you want me to: Explain another verse from John 18? Discuss the historical context of this passage? Answer any specific questions you have about it?

Definition: One of the servants of the high priest, being [his] kinsman whose ear Peter cut off, saith, Did not I see thee in the garden with him?

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from John 18:26. It’s a really powerful and dramatic moment in Jesus’s ministry. Here's what it means, explained simply: The Basic Situation: Peter Cuts Off a Mustard Seed: In the midst of a religious argument with the Jewish leaders, Jesus asks Peter to bring him a single seed from a garden. Peter refuses, and Jesus then brutally throws the seed into a fire. This is a significant event – it’s a symbol of Jesus's authority and power. What the Verse Says: “One of the servants of the high priest, being [his] kinsman whose ear Peter cut off, saith…” (This translates to: “One of the servants of the high priest, who is Peter’s brother, whose ear Peter severed…” ) “His kinsman” : This refers to Peter’s brother. It's a very important detail – it establishes a connection between Jesus and Peter. “Whose ear Peter cut off” : This is the crucial part! Jesus is saying that Peter’s brother was the one who severed his ear. What the Verse Means – It’s a Powerful Revelation: Now, the verse continues with: “ saith…” (This means "said" in Latin). Jesus then asks this question to the servant of the high priest: “Did not I see thee in the garden with him?” The Significance & Interpretation: This is a huge statement. It’s essentially saying: “Do you remember me from the garden? Did I see you there with Peter?” Here's what it implies and why it’s so significant: Jesus is revealing his identity: This isn’t just a casual observation; it’s a direct, undeniable statement of Jesus’s presence. It’s showing that Jesus is the brother who was wronged. A Moment of Recognition & Pain: The fact that Peter severed his ear is a deeply painful event for many people. This verse suggests Jesus recognized this pain and felt it too. It's a moment of profound recognition and perhaps even a hint of sadness or regret on Jesus’s part. Jesus’s Authority & Power: This revelation highlights Jesus’s power – not just to command, but to know and remember . It demonstrates that Jesus is not only powerful but also intimately connected to the events of this time. Overall, this verse is a cornerstone of understanding Jesus's identity and his relationship with humanity. It speaks to his divine nature, his compassion, and his presence in our lives. --- Do you want me to: Explain any part of this verse in more detail? Connect it to a specific biblical story or theme?

Definition: Peter then denied again: and immediately the cock crew.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this incredibly strange and unsettling passage from John 18:27. It's a moment of intense drama and a significant shift in Peter’s actions. Here's what it means, explained simply: What happened? In the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus is about to be crucified. He’s pleading with his Father for forgiveness, and he’s facing arrest. Suddenly, a bird – a rooster – starts crowing. Peter, who was sitting in prayer, reacts incredibly quickly and begins to deny Jesus. What does this actually mean? It's a bit of a twist, but it’s about a bizarre and symbolic event. Here’s the breakdown: The Rooster: The rooster is traditionally associated with warning or impending doom. In this context, it represents a sudden and unexpected interruption to Jesus’s prayer and contemplation. “Denied again”: This is crucial. Peter immediately denies Jesus, which was a deeply significant action in the Gospels. "Cock-crewed": This is the bizarre part. The word “cock” refers to a rooster. The phrase "the cock crew" means to wake up or crow loudly. So, Peter’s denial of Jesus happens as the rooster crows – it’s a sudden, unexpected and disruptive event. What's the significance? This is considered one of the most bizarre and unsettling passages in the Bible. It’s often interpreted as: A Sign of Peter's Doubt: It highlights how quickly and dramatically Peter began to question Jesus’s authority. This was a key moment that led to his rejection of Jesus and ultimately, his crucifixion. A Symbolic Representation of Doubt: The rooster represents doubt or questioning. The suddenness of the event emphasizes the intensity of Peter's disbelief. Jesus’s Own Experience: Some believe this passage reflects a moment where Jesus felt a sense of disruption or unease – perhaps anticipating a challenge or betrayal. Important Note: It’s important to remember that this is a parable – a story with a deeper meaning – and the exact interpretation can vary among theologians and Bible scholars. --- Do you want me to: Explain another part of the passage? Discuss the different interpretations of this verse?

Definition: Then led they Jesus from Caiaphas unto the hall of judgment: and it was early; and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled; but that they might eat the passover.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse. It’s a really important and somewhat mysterious passage from the Gospel of John. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Core Idea: This verse describes Jesus’s preparation for his crucifixion. He was led to a place called “the hall of judgment” – which is essentially where God will judge people after they die. Here’s a breakdown of the key parts: “Then led them Jesus…” : Jesus wasn't just going somewhere; he was being carefully guided. “…unto the hall of judgment:” This refers to the place where God will hold all the souls of people who die, and judge them for their lives. It’s a symbolic space representing eternal consequence. “And it was early…” : This emphasizes that this event happened very soon after Jesus' arrest. It wasn’t something that happened later. “…and they themselves went not into the judgment hall, lest they should be defiled:” This is the crucial part! Jesus deliberately avoided going into the hall of judgment himself. He wanted to stay away from the consequences of death and punishment. He was protecting himself. “but that they might eat the Passover.” : This is a very powerful image. The "Passover" wasn’t just a Jewish holiday – it represented a symbolic meal shared by Jews during their liberation from slavery in Egypt. Jesus was saying, “Let’s celebrate this meal together, even though we are facing a difficult and dangerous situation.” What does it mean? This verse is often interpreted as a powerful message of hope and resilience. It suggests: Jesus knew his fate: He anticipated his death and chose to avoid the consequences of it. He’s offering us a promise: Even though we face challenges, God’s grace and love offer a path to salvation and eternal life. We're called to be courageous: Jesus is inviting us to not despair, but to continue living with faith and hope. In short, this verse is a strategic move by Jesus to protect himself while preparing for his ultimate sacrifice. Do you want me to explain any of these points in more detail? For example, would you like me to: Explain the symbolism of Passover? Discuss the context of this passage within the Gospel?